Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | act | Docusaurus | Gatus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | GitHub | Universal | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 72437 | 66577 | 12381 |
| Last activity | — | October 16, 2026 | September 24, 2026 |
| Install complexity | — | Moderate: Node.js >=20, project files, build and hosting workflow | سهل إلى متوسط / Easy to moderate |
| Category | Testing, Git, DevOps | Workflow, DevOps | Security, DevOps |
| Best use | Best for a developer or small team that repeatedly edits GitHub Actions workflows and wants to test a job before pushing. It provides a local run log, while a final GitHub check remains necessary. It is not suitable when exact hosted-runner parity is required. | Best for a developer or small team maintaining a product or library guide and comfortable with files and Git. It organizes scattered instructions into pages with clear locale and version choices. It does not write or translate your content, and may be excessive for a single page or a team needing direct collaborative editing. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants self-hosted website, API, DNS, and certificate checks with a status page and threshold-based alerts. It combines active checks and simple history in one service. It does not replace resource monitoring, logs, or distributed tracing. |