Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | act | dsh-better-sidebar | dsh-chrome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | GitHub | DeepSeek Harness | DeepSeek Harness |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 72437 | 4478 | 9 |
| Last activity | — | September 23, 2026 | — |
| Install complexity | — | سهل / Easy | متوسط / Moderate |
| Category | Testing, Git, DevOps | Code Review, Git, Workflow, UI | Browser Automation, Security |
| Best use | Best for a developer or small team that repeatedly edits GitHub Actions workflows and wants to test a job before pushing. It provides a local run log, while a final GitHub check remains necessary. It is not suitable when exact hosted-runner parity is required. | Best for a developer using DeepSeek Harness who wants session files, changes, and parallel jobs visible beside the conversation. It adds session-specific context and separates Side Chat questions from the main flow. It is not a standalone full IDE and requires a compatible DSH release. | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. |