Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | act | Gatus | Hurl |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | GitHub | Universal | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 72437 | 12381 | 19271 |
| Last activity | — | September 24, 2026 | October 17, 2026 |
| Install complexity | — | سهل إلى متوسط / Easy to moderate | Easy; API and CLI knowledge required |
| Category | Testing, Git, DevOps | Security, DevOps | Testing, DevOps |
| Best use | Best for a developer or small team that repeatedly edits GitHub Actions workflows and wants to test a job before pushing. It provides a local run log, while a final GitHub check remains necessary. It is not suitable when exact hosted-runner parity is required. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants self-hosted website, API, DNS, and certificate checks with a status page and threshold-based alerts. It combines active checks and simple history in one service. It does not replace resource monitoring, logs, or distributed tracing. | Best for a developer or small team that wants repeatable API checks with explicit conditions stored beside the code. It links request data and identifies failing assertions without repeating manual inspection. It does not replace browser tests or test-environment setup; curl may be enough for a one-off request. |