Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | act | Gatus | Lazygit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | GitHub | Universal | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Stars | 72437 | 12381 | 83385 |
| Last activity | — | September 24, 2026 | October 15, 2026 |
| Install complexity | — | سهل إلى متوسط / Easy to moderate | سهل للتثبيت؛ يحتاج معرفة Git / Easy to install; Git knowledge required |
| Category | Testing, Git, DevOps | Security, DevOps | Code Review, Git |
| Best use | Best for a developer or small team that repeatedly edits GitHub Actions workflows and wants to test a job before pushing. It provides a local run log, while a final GitHub check remains necessary. It is not suitable when exact hosted-runner parity is required. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants self-hosted website, API, DNS, and certificate checks with a status page and threshold-based alerts. It combines active checks and simple history in one service. It does not replace resource monitoring, logs, or distributed tracing. | Best for a solo developer or small team that works from the terminal and wants focused, reviewable commits. It helps select changes and open another branch in a separate working folder. It does not replace tests or Git knowledge; your editor interface may already be enough. |