Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Backlog.md | dsh-chrome | Lazygit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal, Codex, Claude Code, Cursor | DeepSeek Harness | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 7130 | 9 | 83385 |
| Last activity | — | — | October 15, 2026 |
| Install complexity | Easy — npm, Bun, Homebrew, or Nix | متوسط / Moderate | سهل للتثبيت؛ يحتاج معرفة Git / Easy to install; Git knowledge required |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Git, Workflow | Browser Automation, Security | Code Review, Git |
| Best use | Best for an individual developer or small team using coding agents and wanting to review the specification and plan before code. It keeps tasks, acceptance criteria, and decisions inside the project and exposes them through CLI, a local browser, or MCP. It is not a replacement for a centralized enterprise SaaS board with organization-wide permissions and reporting. | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. | Best for a solo developer or small team that works from the terminal and wants focused, reviewable commits. It helps select changes and open another branch in a separate working folder. It does not replace tests or Git knowledge; your editor interface may already be enough. |