Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Backlog.md | dsh-task-board | dsh-chrome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal, Codex, Claude Code, Cursor | DeepSeek Harness | DeepSeek Harness |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Stars | 7131 | 9384 | 9 |
| Last activity | — | — | — |
| Install complexity | Easy — npm, Bun, Homebrew, or Nix | Intermediate | متوسط / Moderate |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Git, Workflow | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Browser Automation, Security |
| Best use | Best for an individual developer or small team using coding agents and wanting to review the specification and plan before code. It keeps tasks, acceptance criteria, and decisions inside the project and exposes them through CLI, a local browser, or MCP. It is not a replacement for a centralized enterprise SaaS board with organization-wide permissions and reporting. | Best for a developer or small team using DSH for recurring or connected work and wanting task state and execution evidence in one record. It pins the project, agent preset, and permission, then runs manually or through Host cron with a human gate for elevated access. It is not a fit for a frequently sleeping machine or unreviewed sensitive automation. | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. |