Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Backlog.md | DuckDB | Gatus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal, Codex, Claude Code, Cursor | Universal | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 7131 | 42454 | 12381 |
| Last activity | — | September 28, 2026 | September 24, 2026 |
| Install complexity | Easy — npm, Bun, Homebrew, or Nix | سهل — حزمة Python أو ملف CLI تنفيذي واحد | سهل إلى متوسط / Easy to moderate |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Git, Workflow | Database | Security, DevOps |
| Best use | Best for an individual developer or small team using coding agents and wanting to review the specification and plan before code. It keeps tasks, acceptance criteria, and decisions inside the project and exposes them through CLI, a local browser, or MCP. It is not a replacement for a centralized enterprise SaaS board with organization-wide permissions and reporting. | Best for an analyst, developer, or small team that needs to inspect and join large data files and rerun analysis locally. It adds reviewable SQL without database-server setup. It is not a multi-user transactional database for many small concurrent writes from separate processes. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants self-hosted website, API, DNS, and certificate checks with a status page and threshold-based alerts. It combines active checks and simple history in one service. It does not replace resource monitoring, logs, or distributed tracing. |