Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Backlog.md | Gatus | dsh-git-graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal, Codex, Claude Code, Cursor | Universal | DeepSeek Harness |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 7130 | 12381 | 9384 |
| Last activity | — | September 24, 2026 | September 25, 2026 |
| Install complexity | Easy — npm, Bun, Homebrew, or Nix | سهل إلى متوسط / Easy to moderate | سهل / Easy |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Git, Workflow | Security, DevOps | Git, Workflow, UI |
| Best use | Best for an individual developer or small team using coding agents and wanting to review the specification and plan before code. It keeps tasks, acceptance criteria, and decisions inside the project and exposes them through CLI, a local browser, or MCP. It is not a replacement for a centralized enterprise SaaS board with organization-wide permissions and reporting. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants self-hosted website, API, DNS, and certificate checks with a status page and threshold-based alerts. It combines active checks and simple history in one service. It does not replace resource monitoring, logs, or distributed tracing. | Best for a developer running several DSH sessions against one repository who wants visible branch context, history, and worktree creation in the UI. It adds session isolation and readable branch-switch guards. It may be excessive for one small change on one branch or for environments that prohibit outbound telemetry. |