Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Backlog.md | Miller | DuckDB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal, Codex, Claude Code, Cursor | Universal, MCP, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Stars | 7130 | 10049 | 42451 |
| Last activity | — | October 21, 2026 | September 28, 2026 |
| Install complexity | Easy — npm, Bun, Homebrew, or Nix | EASY | سهل — حزمة Python أو ملف CLI تنفيذي واحد |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Git, Workflow | Workflow, Data | Database |
| Best use | Best for an individual developer or small team using coding agents and wanting to review the specification and plan before code. It keeps tasks, acceptance criteria, and decisions inside the project and exposes them through CLI, a local browser, or MCP. It is not a replacement for a centralized enterprise SaaS board with organization-wide permissions and reporting. | Ideal for developers, data analysts, and operators who need to clean a CSV export, inspect JSON Lines, or summarize a large file from the terminal without starting a Python project. Use it for quick, repeatable file processing; concurrent transactions and advanced visual analysis still call for a database or complementary analytics tool. | Best for an analyst, developer, or small team that needs to inspect and join large data files and rerun analysis locally. It adds reviewable SQL without database-server setup. It is not a multi-user transactional database for many small concurrent writes from separate processes. |