Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Backlog.md | Miller | Superpowers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal, Codex, Claude Code, Cursor | Universal, MCP, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Stars | 7133 | 10049 | 304170 |
| Last activity | — | October 21, 2026 | — |
| Install complexity | Easy — npm, Bun, Homebrew, or Nix | EASY | — |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Git, Workflow | Workflow, Data | Code Review, Multi-Agent, Testing, Workflow |
| Best use | Best for an individual developer or small team using coding agents and wanting to review the specification and plan before code. It keeps tasks, acceptance criteria, and decisions inside the project and exposes them through CLI, a local browser, or MCP. It is not a replacement for a centralized enterprise SaaS board with organization-wide permissions and reporting. | Ideal for developers, data analysts, and operators who need to clean a CSV export, inspect JSON Lines, or summarize a large file from the terminal without starting a Python project. Use it for quick, repeatable file processing; concurrent transactions and advanced visual analysis still call for a database or complementary analytics tool. | Best for a developer or project owner working on a substantial feature or a difficult bug. It helps clarify requirements, approve a plan, and inspect tests and file changes. Its value is a visible path from decision to verification. A small text edit may not need the full workflow. |