Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Beszel | dsh-chrome | Gatus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | DeepSeek Harness | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 26480 | 9 | 12380 |
| Last activity | October 20, 2026 | — | September 24, 2026 |
| Install complexity | متوسط / Medium | متوسط / Moderate | سهل إلى متوسط / Easy to moderate |
| Category | DevOps, Monitoring | Browser Automation, Security | Security, DevOps |
| Best use | Best for an individual developer or small team running a VPS, home server, or a few Docker hosts and needing a simple dashboard, history, and alerts. Its value is combining host and container metrics in a self-hosted hub. It is not a full logs-and-traces observability platform. | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants self-hosted website, API, DNS, and certificate checks with a status page and threshold-based alerts. It combines active checks and simple history in one service. It does not replace resource monitoring, logs, or distributed tracing. |