Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Bruno | Gatus | MarkItDown |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Stars | 47971 | 12458 | 193309 |
| Last activity | October 30, 2026 | September 24, 2026 | — |
| Install complexity | EASY | سهل إلى متوسط / Easy to moderate | سهل / Easy |
| Category | Testing, Git | Security, DevOps | Workflow, Research |
| Best use | Ideal for a solo developer or small team that wants API collections and tests beside the code with Git review. Use it for repeatable REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and WebSocket checks—not live cloud collaboration or load testing. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants self-hosted website, API, DNS, and certificate checks with a status page and threshold-based alerts. It combines active checks and simple history in one service. It does not replace resource monitoring, logs, or distributed tracing. | Best for a developer or analyst extracting text from several document formats before search or supplying selected passages to an AI agent. It provides a repeatable CLI command and Python library, while requiring review against the original. It is not intended for layout-perfect document publishing. |