Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Bruno | Lazygit | Lychee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 47971 | 83579 | 4074 |
| Last activity | October 30, 2026 | October 15, 2026 | October 26, 2026 |
| Install complexity | EASY | سهل للتثبيت؛ يحتاج معرفة Git / Easy to install; Git knowledge required | — |
| Category | Testing, Git | Code Review, Git | Testing, Workflow |
| Best use | Ideal for a solo developer or small team that wants API collections and tests beside the code with Git review. Use it for repeatable REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and WebSocket checks—not live cloud collaboration or load testing. | Best for a solo developer or small team that works from the terminal and wants focused, reviewable commits. It helps select changes and open another branch in a separate working folder. It does not replace tests or Git knowledge; your editor interface may already be enough. | For documentation authors and small teams checking references locally or in CI. Start with a specific file and interpret findings; it does not establish complete site or login functionality. |