Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Bruno | Lychee | Beszel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Stars | 47971 | 4074 | 26750 |
| Last activity | October 30, 2026 | October 26, 2026 | October 20, 2026 |
| Install complexity | EASY | — | متوسط / Medium |
| Category | Testing, Git | Testing, Workflow | DevOps, Monitoring |
| Best use | Ideal for a solo developer or small team that wants API collections and tests beside the code with Git review. Use it for repeatable REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and WebSocket checks—not live cloud collaboration or load testing. | For documentation authors and small teams checking references locally or in CI. Start with a specific file and interpret findings; it does not establish complete site or login functionality. | Best for an individual developer or small team running a VPS, home server, or a few Docker hosts and needing a simple dashboard, history, and alerts. Its value is combining host and container metrics in a self-hosted hub. It is not a full logs-and-traces observability platform. |