Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Bruno | Miller | Lychee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal, MCP, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 47971 | 10055 | 4074 |
| Last activity | October 30, 2026 | October 21, 2026 | October 26, 2026 |
| Install complexity | EASY | EASY | — |
| Category | Testing, Git | Workflow, Data | Testing, Workflow |
| Best use | Ideal for a solo developer or small team that wants API collections and tests beside the code with Git review. Use it for repeatable REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and WebSocket checks—not live cloud collaboration or load testing. | Ideal for developers, data analysts, and operators who need to clean a CSV export, inspect JSON Lines, or summarize a large file from the terminal without starting a Python project. Use it for quick, repeatable file processing; concurrent transactions and advanced visual analysis still call for a database or complementary analytics tool. | For documentation authors and small teams checking references locally or in CI. Start with a specific file and interpret findings; it does not establish complete site or login functionality. |