Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Dagu | Gatus | zoxide |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal, MCP | Universal | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Stars | 4491 | 12439 | 40353 |
| Last activity | October 28, 2026 | September 24, 2026 | October 24, 2026 |
| Install complexity | سهل للبداية؛ يحتاج ضبط أمان قبل المشاركة / Easy to start; security configuration required before sharing | سهل إلى متوسط / Easy to moderate | — |
| Category | Workflow, DevOps, Monitoring | Security, DevOps | Workflow |
| Best use | Best for a developer or small team with connected scripts that need schedules, history, and a clear failure point. It adds dependencies, retries, and an operations UI without an external database in single-server mode. A simple independent command may not need it, and some team controls such as additional users, SSO, RBAC, and audit logging currently require a paid license. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants self-hosted website, API, DNS, and certificate checks with a status page and threshold-based alerts. It combines active checks and simple history in one service. It does not replace resource monitoring, logs, or distributed tracing. | For developers switching among many directories in an interactive terminal. It learns from visited paths and helps you return; use explicit paths for scripts and deployments that require a fixed destination. |