Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Docmost | Beszel | marimo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 22196 | 26775 | 23404 |
| Last activity | November 1, 2026 | October 20, 2026 | October 29, 2026 |
| Install complexity | MODERATE | متوسط / Medium | EASY |
| Category | Workflow | DevOps, Monitoring | Workflow, Data |
| Best use | Ideal for a small team that wants runbooks, product decisions, and system documentation on its own server with live editing, search, and page history. It is not a fit for teams that want zero server operations or expect SSO and granular page permissions in the free edition. | Best for an individual developer or small team running a VPS, home server, or a few Docker hosts and needing a simple dashboard, history, and alerts. Its value is combining host and container metrics in a self-hosted hub. It is not a full logs-and-traces observability platform. | Ideal for a data analyst, Python developer, or small team that wants reproducible experiments, clear Git review, and an interactive report or internal tool from the same source. It is not a replacement for governed BI or a production service requiring enterprise scaling and permissions. |