Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Docmost | Gitleaks | Bruno |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal, GitHub | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 22196 | 30590 | 47985 |
| Last activity | November 1, 2026 | October 23, 2026 | October 30, 2026 |
| Install complexity | MODERATE | LOW | EASY |
| Category | Workflow | Security, Git, DevOps | Testing, Git |
| Best use | Ideal for a small team that wants runbooks, product decisions, and system documentation on its own server with live editing, search, and page history. It is not a fit for teams that want zero server operations or expect SSO and granular page permissions in the free edition. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants a local pre-commit secret scan plus a second CI gate. It is especially useful around deployment configuration and environment files. It does not replace a secret manager or credential revocation after a leak. | Ideal for a solo developer or small team that wants API collections and tests beside the code with Git review. Use it for repeatable REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and WebSocket checks—not live cloud collaboration or load testing. |