Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Docmost | MarkItDown | ntfy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT | Apache-2.0 / GPL-2.0 |
| Stars | 22196 | 193476 | 35225 |
| Last activity | November 1, 2026 | — | September 29, 2026 |
| Install complexity | MODERATE | سهل / Easy | سهل للتجربة، متوسط للاستضافة الآمنة / Easy to try, moderate to self-host securely |
| Category | Workflow | Workflow, Research | Workflow, DevOps |
| Best use | Ideal for a small team that wants runbooks, product decisions, and system documentation on its own server with live editing, search, and page history. It is not a fit for teams that want zero server operations or expect SSO and granular page permissions in the free edition. | Best for a developer or analyst extracting text from several document formats before search or supplying selected passages to an AI agent. It provides a repeatable CLI command and Python library, while requiring review against the original. It is not intended for layout-perfect document publishing. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants backup, deployment, and scheduled-job alerts without building a notification app. It starts with one HTTP request and can be self-hosted with users and ACLs. It is not a complete incident-management or log-retention system. |