Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-agent-teams | act | dsh-git-graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | GitHub | DeepSeek Harness |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 2386 | 72437 | 9384 |
| Last activity | — | — | September 25, 2026 |
| Install complexity | يتطلب إصدار DSH متوافقًا وإعادة تشغيل | — | سهل / Easy |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Testing, Git, DevOps | Git, Workflow, UI |
| Best use | For development work that can be divided into dependent tasks and reviewed as a plan before agents start. Monitor outputs and model costs; team state is not coordinated across separate processes. | Best for a developer or small team that repeatedly edits GitHub Actions workflows and wants to test a job before pushing. It provides a local run log, while a final GitHub check remains necessary. It is not suitable when exact hosted-runner parity is required. | Best for a developer running several DSH sessions against one repository who wants visible branch context, history, and worktree creation in the UI. It adds session isolation and readable branch-switch guards. It may be excessive for one small change on one branch or for environments that prohibit outbound telemetry. |