Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-agent-teams | Backlog.md | Beszel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | Universal, Codex, Claude Code, Cursor | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 2386 | 7131 | 26480 |
| Last activity | — | — | October 20, 2026 |
| Install complexity | يتطلب إصدار DSH متوافقًا وإعادة تشغيل | Easy — npm, Bun, Homebrew, or Nix | متوسط / Medium |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Multi-Agent, Git, Workflow | DevOps, Monitoring |
| Best use | For development work that can be divided into dependent tasks and reviewed as a plan before agents start. Monitor outputs and model costs; team state is not coordinated across separate processes. | Best for an individual developer or small team using coding agents and wanting to review the specification and plan before code. It keeps tasks, acceptance criteria, and decisions inside the project and exposes them through CLI, a local browser, or MCP. It is not a replacement for a centralized enterprise SaaS board with organization-wide permissions and reporting. | Best for an individual developer or small team running a VPS, home server, or a few Docker hosts and needing a simple dashboard, history, and alerts. Its value is combining host and container metrics in a self-hosted hub. It is not a full logs-and-traces observability platform. |