Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-agent-teams | Backlog.md | dsh-better-sidebar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | Universal, Codex, Claude Code, Cursor | DeepSeek Harness |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 2386 | 7131 | 4478 |
| Last activity | — | — | September 23, 2026 |
| Install complexity | يتطلب إصدار DSH متوافقًا وإعادة تشغيل | Easy — npm, Bun, Homebrew, or Nix | سهل / Easy |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Multi-Agent, Git, Workflow | Code Review, Git, Workflow, UI |
| Best use | For development work that can be divided into dependent tasks and reviewed as a plan before agents start. Monitor outputs and model costs; team state is not coordinated across separate processes. | Best for an individual developer or small team using coding agents and wanting to review the specification and plan before code. It keeps tasks, acceptance criteria, and decisions inside the project and exposes them through CLI, a local browser, or MCP. It is not a replacement for a centralized enterprise SaaS board with organization-wide permissions and reporting. | Best for a developer using DeepSeek Harness who wants session files, changes, and parallel jobs visible beside the conversation. It adds session-specific context and separates Side Chat questions from the main flow. It is not a standalone full IDE and requires a compatible DSH release. |