Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-agent-teams | dsh-chrome | dsh-git-graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | DeepSeek Harness | DeepSeek Harness |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 2386 | 9 | 9384 |
| Last activity | — | — | September 25, 2026 |
| Install complexity | يتطلب إصدار DSH متوافقًا وإعادة تشغيل | متوسط / Moderate | سهل / Easy |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Browser Automation, Security | Git, Workflow, UI |
| Best use | For development work that can be divided into dependent tasks and reviewed as a plan before agents start. Monitor outputs and model costs; team state is not coordinated across separate processes. | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. | Best for a developer running several DSH sessions against one repository who wants visible branch context, history, and worktree creation in the UI. It adds session isolation and readable branch-switch guards. It may be excessive for one small change on one branch or for environments that prohibit outbound telemetry. |