Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-agent-teams | dsh-chrome | Miller |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | DeepSeek Harness | Universal, MCP, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Stars | 2386 | 9 | 10049 |
| Last activity | — | — | October 21, 2026 |
| Install complexity | يتطلب إصدار DSH متوافقًا وإعادة تشغيل | متوسط / Moderate | EASY |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Browser Automation, Security | Workflow, Data |
| Best use | For development work that can be divided into dependent tasks and reviewed as a plan before agents start. Monitor outputs and model costs; team state is not coordinated across separate processes. | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. | Ideal for developers, data analysts, and operators who need to clean a CSV export, inspect JSON Lines, or summarize a large file from the terminal without starting a Python project. Use it for quick, repeatable file processing; concurrent transactions and advanced visual analysis still call for a database or complementary analytics tool. |