Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-agent-teams | dsh-chrome | ntfy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | DeepSeek Harness | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | Apache-2.0 / GPL-2.0 |
| Stars | 2386 | 9 | 35017 |
| Last activity | — | — | September 29, 2026 |
| Install complexity | يتطلب إصدار DSH متوافقًا وإعادة تشغيل | متوسط / Moderate | سهل للتجربة، متوسط للاستضافة الآمنة / Easy to try, moderate to self-host securely |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Browser Automation, Security | Workflow, DevOps |
| Best use | For development work that can be divided into dependent tasks and reviewed as a plan before agents start. Monitor outputs and model costs; team state is not coordinated across separate processes. | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants backup, deployment, and scheduled-job alerts without building a notification app. It starts with one HTTP request and can be self-hosted with users and ACLs. It is not a complete incident-management or log-retention system. |