Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-agent-teams | dsh-git-graph | Hurl |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | DeepSeek Harness | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 2386 | 9384 | 19271 |
| Last activity | — | September 25, 2026 | October 17, 2026 |
| Install complexity | يتطلب إصدار DSH متوافقًا وإعادة تشغيل | سهل / Easy | Easy; API and CLI knowledge required |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Git, Workflow, UI | Testing, DevOps |
| Best use | For development work that can be divided into dependent tasks and reviewed as a plan before agents start. Monitor outputs and model costs; team state is not coordinated across separate processes. | Best for a developer running several DSH sessions against one repository who wants visible branch context, history, and worktree creation in the UI. It adds session isolation and readable branch-switch guards. It may be excessive for one small change on one branch or for environments that prohibit outbound telemetry. | Best for a developer or small team that wants repeatable API checks with explicit conditions stored beside the code. It links request data and identifies failing assertions without repeating manual inspection. It does not replace browser tests or test-environment setup; curl may be enough for a one-off request. |