Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-agent-teams | dsh-git-graph | restic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | DeepSeek Harness | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Stars | 2386 | 9384 | 36756 |
| Last activity | — | September 25, 2026 | September 25, 2026 |
| Install complexity | يتطلب إصدار DSH متوافقًا وإعادة تشغيل | سهل / Easy | متوسط: CLI ومستودع وجدولة منفصلة / Moderate: CLI, repository, and separate scheduling |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Git, Workflow, UI | Security, DevOps |
| Best use | For development work that can be divided into dependent tasks and reviewed as a plan before agents start. Monitor outputs and model costs; team state is not coordinated across separate processes. | Best for a developer running several DSH sessions against one repository who wants visible branch context, history, and worktree creation in the UI. It adds session isolation and readable branch-switch guards. It may be excessive for one small change on one branch or for environments that prohibit outbound telemetry. | Best for an individual developer or small team that needs encrypted, testable backups of project files and exported database dumps. It works with local or remote storage and can be scheduled by the operating system. It does not replace application-consistent database exports or recovery testing. |