Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-agent-teams | dsh-task-board | dsh-chrome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | DeepSeek Harness | DeepSeek Harness |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Stars | 2386 | 9384 | 9 |
| Last activity | — | — | — |
| Install complexity | يتطلب إصدار DSH متوافقًا وإعادة تشغيل | Intermediate | متوسط / Moderate |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Browser Automation, Security |
| Best use | For development work that can be divided into dependent tasks and reviewed as a plan before agents start. Monitor outputs and model costs; team state is not coordinated across separate processes. | Best for a developer or small team using DSH for recurring or connected work and wanting task state and execution evidence in one record. It pins the project, agent preset, and permission, then runs manually or through Host cron with a human gate for elevated access. It is not a fit for a frequently sleeping machine or unreviewed sensitive automation. | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. |