Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-agent-teams | Hurl | dsh-chrome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | Universal | DeepSeek Harness |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Stars | 2387 | 19271 | 9 |
| Last activity | — | October 17, 2026 | — |
| Install complexity | يتطلب إصدار DSH متوافقًا وإعادة تشغيل | Easy; API and CLI knowledge required | متوسط / Moderate |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Testing, DevOps | Browser Automation, Security |
| Best use | For development work that can be divided into dependent tasks and reviewed as a plan before agents start. Monitor outputs and model costs; team state is not coordinated across separate processes. | Best for a developer or small team that wants repeatable API checks with explicit conditions stored beside the code. It links request data and identifies failing assertions without repeating manual inspection. It does not replace browser tests or test-environment setup; curl may be enough for a one-off request. | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. |