Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-agent-teams | Lazygit | dsh-task-board |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | Universal | DeepSeek Harness |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 2386 | 83388 | 9384 |
| Last activity | — | October 15, 2026 | — |
| Install complexity | يتطلب إصدار DSH متوافقًا وإعادة تشغيل | سهل للتثبيت؛ يحتاج معرفة Git / Easy to install; Git knowledge required | Intermediate |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Code Review, Git | Multi-Agent, Workflow |
| Best use | For development work that can be divided into dependent tasks and reviewed as a plan before agents start. Monitor outputs and model costs; team state is not coordinated across separate processes. | Best for a solo developer or small team that works from the terminal and wants focused, reviewable commits. It helps select changes and open another branch in a separate working folder. It does not replace tests or Git knowledge; your editor interface may already be enough. | Best for a developer or small team using DSH for recurring or connected work and wanting task state and execution evidence in one record. It pins the project, agent preset, and permission, then runs manually or through Host cron with a human gate for elevated access. It is not a fit for a frequently sleeping machine or unreviewed sensitive automation. |