Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-agent-teams | MarkItDown | Backlog.md |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | Universal | Universal, Codex, Claude Code, Cursor |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 2386 | 191797 | 7130 |
| Last activity | — | — | — |
| Install complexity | يتطلب إصدار DSH متوافقًا وإعادة تشغيل | سهل / Easy | Easy — npm, Bun, Homebrew, or Nix |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Workflow, Research | Multi-Agent, Git, Workflow |
| Best use | For development work that can be divided into dependent tasks and reviewed as a plan before agents start. Monitor outputs and model costs; team state is not coordinated across separate processes. | Best for a developer or analyst extracting text from several document formats before search or supplying selected passages to an AI agent. It provides a repeatable CLI command and Python library, while requiring review against the original. It is not intended for layout-perfect document publishing. | Best for an individual developer or small team using coding agents and wanting to review the specification and plan before code. It keeps tasks, acceptance criteria, and decisions inside the project and exposes them through CLI, a local browser, or MCP. It is not a replacement for a centralized enterprise SaaS board with organization-wide permissions and reporting. |