Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-agent-teams | MarkItDown | dsh-chrome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | Universal | DeepSeek Harness |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 2386 | 191797 | 9 |
| Last activity | — | — | — |
| Install complexity | يتطلب إصدار DSH متوافقًا وإعادة تشغيل | سهل / Easy | متوسط / Moderate |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Workflow, Research | Browser Automation, Security |
| Best use | For development work that can be divided into dependent tasks and reviewed as a plan before agents start. Monitor outputs and model costs; team state is not coordinated across separate processes. | Best for a developer or analyst extracting text from several document formats before search or supplying selected passages to an AI agent. It provides a repeatable CLI command and Python library, while requiring review against the original. It is not intended for layout-perfect document publishing. | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. |