Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-chrome | MarkItDown | dsh-git-graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | Universal | DeepSeek Harness |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 9 | 191797 | 9384 |
| Last activity | — | — | September 25, 2026 |
| Install complexity | متوسط / Moderate | سهل / Easy | سهل / Easy |
| Category | Browser Automation, Security | Workflow, Research | Git, Workflow, UI |
| Best use | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. | Best for a developer or analyst extracting text from several document formats before search or supplying selected passages to an AI agent. It provides a repeatable CLI command and Python library, while requiring review against the original. It is not intended for layout-perfect document publishing. | Best for a developer running several DSH sessions against one repository who wants visible branch context, history, and worktree creation in the UI. It adds session isolation and readable branch-switch guards. It may be excessive for one small change on one branch or for environments that prohibit outbound telemetry. |