Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-chrome | MarkItDown | DuckDB |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | Universal | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 9 | 191797 | 42451 |
| Last activity | — | — | September 28, 2026 |
| Install complexity | متوسط / Moderate | سهل / Easy | سهل — حزمة Python أو ملف CLI تنفيذي واحد |
| Category | Browser Automation, Security | Workflow, Research | Database |
| Best use | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. | Best for a developer or analyst extracting text from several document formats before search or supplying selected passages to an AI agent. It provides a repeatable CLI command and Python library, while requiring review against the original. It is not intended for layout-perfect document publishing. | Best for an analyst, developer, or small team that needs to inspect and join large data files and rerun analysis locally. It adds reviewable SQL without database-server setup. It is not a multi-user transactional database for many small concurrent writes from separate processes. |