Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-git-graph | act | restic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | GitHub | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Stars | 9384 | 72437 | 36756 |
| Last activity | September 25, 2026 | — | September 25, 2026 |
| Install complexity | سهل / Easy | — | متوسط: CLI ومستودع وجدولة منفصلة / Moderate: CLI, repository, and separate scheduling |
| Category | Git, Workflow, UI | Testing, Git, DevOps | Security, DevOps |
| Best use | Best for a developer running several DSH sessions against one repository who wants visible branch context, history, and worktree creation in the UI. It adds session isolation and readable branch-switch guards. It may be excessive for one small change on one branch or for environments that prohibit outbound telemetry. | Best for a developer or small team that repeatedly edits GitHub Actions workflows and wants to test a job before pushing. It provides a local run log, while a final GitHub check remains necessary. It is not suitable when exact hosted-runner parity is required. | Best for an individual developer or small team that needs encrypted, testable backups of project files and exported database dumps. It works with local or remote storage and can be scheduled by the operating system. It does not replace application-consistent database exports or recovery testing. |