Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-task-board | dsh-chrome | act |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | DeepSeek Harness | GitHub |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 9384 | 9 | 72437 |
| Last activity | — | — | — |
| Install complexity | Intermediate | متوسط / Moderate | — |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Browser Automation, Security | Testing, Git, DevOps |
| Best use | Best for a developer or small team using DSH for recurring or connected work and wanting task state and execution evidence in one record. It pins the project, agent preset, and permission, then runs manually or through Host cron with a human gate for elevated access. It is not a fit for a frequently sleeping machine or unreviewed sensitive automation. | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. | Best for a developer or small team that repeatedly edits GitHub Actions workflows and wants to test a job before pushing. It provides a local run log, while a final GitHub check remains necessary. It is not suitable when exact hosted-runner parity is required. |