Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-task-board | dsh-chrome | Hurl |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | DeepSeek Harness | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 9384 | 9 | 19271 |
| Last activity | — | — | October 17, 2026 |
| Install complexity | Intermediate | متوسط / Moderate | Easy; API and CLI knowledge required |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Browser Automation, Security | Testing, DevOps |
| Best use | Best for a developer or small team using DSH for recurring or connected work and wanting task state and execution evidence in one record. It pins the project, agent preset, and permission, then runs manually or through Host cron with a human gate for elevated access. It is not a fit for a frequently sleeping machine or unreviewed sensitive automation. | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. | Best for a developer or small team that wants repeatable API checks with explicit conditions stored beside the code. It links request data and identifies failing assertions without repeating manual inspection. It does not replace browser tests or test-environment setup; curl may be enough for a one-off request. |