Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-task-board | Miller | Beszel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | Universal, MCP, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Stars | 9384 | 10049 | 26480 |
| Last activity | — | October 21, 2026 | October 20, 2026 |
| Install complexity | Intermediate | EASY | متوسط / Medium |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Workflow, Data | DevOps, Monitoring |
| Best use | Best for a developer or small team using DSH for recurring or connected work and wanting task state and execution evidence in one record. It pins the project, agent preset, and permission, then runs manually or through Host cron with a human gate for elevated access. It is not a fit for a frequently sleeping machine or unreviewed sensitive automation. | Ideal for developers, data analysts, and operators who need to clean a CSV export, inspect JSON Lines, or summarize a large file from the terminal without starting a Python project. Use it for quick, repeatable file processing; concurrent transactions and advanced visual analysis still call for a database or complementary analytics tool. | Best for an individual developer or small team running a VPS, home server, or a few Docker hosts and needing a simple dashboard, history, and alerts. Its value is combining host and container metrics in a self-hosted hub. It is not a full logs-and-traces observability platform. |