Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | dsh-task-board | Superpowers | Miller |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | DeepSeek Harness | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode | Universal, MCP, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Stars | 9384 | 304147 | 10049 |
| Last activity | — | — | October 21, 2026 |
| Install complexity | Intermediate | — | EASY |
| Category | Multi-Agent, Workflow | Code Review, Multi-Agent, Testing, Workflow | Workflow, Data |
| Best use | Best for a developer or small team using DSH for recurring or connected work and wanting task state and execution evidence in one record. It pins the project, agent preset, and permission, then runs manually or through Host cron with a human gate for elevated access. It is not a fit for a frequently sleeping machine or unreviewed sensitive automation. | Best for a developer or project owner working on a substantial feature or a difficult bug. It helps clarify requirements, approve a plan, and inspect tests and file changes. Its value is a visible path from decision to verification. A small text edit may not need the full workflow. | Ideal for developers, data analysts, and operators who need to clean a CSV export, inspect JSON Lines, or summarize a large file from the terminal without starting a Python project. Use it for quick, repeatable file processing; concurrent transactions and advanced visual analysis still call for a database or complementary analytics tool. |