Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | DuckDB | Gatus | Beszel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Stars | 42451 | 12381 | 26480 |
| Last activity | September 28, 2026 | September 24, 2026 | October 20, 2026 |
| Install complexity | سهل — حزمة Python أو ملف CLI تنفيذي واحد | سهل إلى متوسط / Easy to moderate | متوسط / Medium |
| Category | Database | Security, DevOps | DevOps, Monitoring |
| Best use | Best for an analyst, developer, or small team that needs to inspect and join large data files and rerun analysis locally. It adds reviewable SQL without database-server setup. It is not a multi-user transactional database for many small concurrent writes from separate processes. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants self-hosted website, API, DNS, and certificate checks with a status page and threshold-based alerts. It combines active checks and simple history in one service. It does not replace resource monitoring, logs, or distributed tracing. | Best for an individual developer or small team running a VPS, home server, or a few Docker hosts and needing a simple dashboard, history, and alerts. Its value is combining host and container metrics in a self-hosted hub. It is not a full logs-and-traces observability platform. |