Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Gitleaks | Backlog.md | act |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal, GitHub | Universal, Codex, Claude Code, Cursor | GitHub |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 30318 | 7149 | 72444 |
| Last activity | October 23, 2026 | — | — |
| Install complexity | LOW | Easy — npm, Bun, Homebrew, or Nix | — |
| Category | Security, Git, DevOps | Multi-Agent, Git, Workflow | Testing, Git, DevOps |
| Best use | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants a local pre-commit secret scan plus a second CI gate. It is especially useful around deployment configuration and environment files. It does not replace a secret manager or credential revocation after a leak. | Best for an individual developer or small team using coding agents and wanting to review the specification and plan before code. It keeps tasks, acceptance criteria, and decisions inside the project and exposes them through CLI, a local browser, or MCP. It is not a replacement for a centralized enterprise SaaS board with organization-wide permissions and reporting. | Best for a developer or small team that repeatedly edits GitHub Actions workflows and wants to test a job before pushing. It provides a local run log, while a final GitHub check remains necessary. It is not suitable when exact hosted-runner parity is required. |