Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Gitleaks | goose | MarkItDown |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal, GitHub | Universal, MCP | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Stars | 30318 | 55687 | 192085 |
| Last activity | October 23, 2026 | October 23, 2026 | — |
| Install complexity | LOW | MEDIUM | سهل / Easy |
| Category | Security, Git, DevOps | Code Review, Multi-Agent, Workflow | Workflow, Research |
| Best use | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants a local pre-commit secret scan plus a second CI gate. It is especially useful around deployment configuration and environment files. It does not replace a secret manager or credential revocation after a leak. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants an AI agent to complete an inspectable task in a working copy: understand files, make a bounded change, and run a test. Start with manual approval and scope the folder and tools. Do not give it broad access to production or sensitive data. | Best for a developer or analyst extracting text from several document formats before search or supplying selected passages to an AI agent. It provides a repeatable CLI command and Python library, while requiring review against the original. It is not intended for layout-perfect document publishing. |