Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Gitleaks | MarkItDown | dsh-chrome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal, GitHub | Universal | DeepSeek Harness |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 30318 | 192085 | 9 |
| Last activity | October 23, 2026 | — | — |
| Install complexity | LOW | سهل / Easy | متوسط / Moderate |
| Category | Security, Git, DevOps | Workflow, Research | Browser Automation, Security |
| Best use | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants a local pre-commit secret scan plus a second CI gate. It is especially useful around deployment configuration and environment files. It does not replace a secret manager or credential revocation after a leak. | Best for a developer or analyst extracting text from several document formats before search or supplying selected passages to an AI agent. It provides a repeatable CLI command and Python library, while requiring review against the original. It is not intended for layout-perfect document publishing. | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. |