Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | goose | dsh-chrome | act |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal, MCP | DeepSeek Harness | GitHub |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 55588 | 9 | 72437 |
| Last activity | October 23, 2026 | — | — |
| Install complexity | MEDIUM | متوسط / Moderate | — |
| Category | Code Review, Multi-Agent, Workflow | Browser Automation, Security | Testing, Git, DevOps |
| Best use | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants an AI agent to complete an inspectable task in a working copy: understand files, make a bounded change, and run a test. Start with manual approval and scope the folder and tools. Do not give it broad access to production or sensitive data. | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. | Best for a developer or small team that repeatedly edits GitHub Actions workflows and wants to test a job before pushing. It provides a local run log, while a final GitHub check remains necessary. It is not suitable when exact hosted-runner parity is required. |