Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Jujutsu (jj) | Backlog.md | act |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal, Codex, Claude Code, Cursor | GitHub |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 32275 | 7185 | 72471 |
| Last activity | October 28, 2026 | — | — |
| Install complexity | CLI | Easy — npm, Bun, Homebrew, or Nix | — |
| Category | Git, Workflow | Multi-Agent, Git, Workflow | Testing, Git, DevOps |
| Best use | For developers reviewing features as small changes and revisiting earlier steps. Start with a separate practice clone to learn working copies and Bookmarks; delay team adoption until compatibility with required Git tooling is checked. | Best for an individual developer or small team using coding agents and wanting to review the specification and plan before code. It keeps tasks, acceptance criteria, and decisions inside the project and exposes them through CLI, a local browser, or MCP. It is not a replacement for a centralized enterprise SaaS board with organization-wide permissions and reporting. | Best for a developer or small team that repeatedly edits GitHub Actions workflows and wants to test a job before pushing. It provides a local run log, while a final GitHub check remains necessary. It is not suitable when exact hosted-runner parity is required. |