Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Jujutsu (jj) | Hurl | Miller |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal | Universal, MCP, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Stars | 32275 | 19282 | 10051 |
| Last activity | October 28, 2026 | October 17, 2026 | October 21, 2026 |
| Install complexity | CLI | Easy; API and CLI knowledge required | EASY |
| Category | Git, Workflow | Testing, DevOps | Workflow, Data |
| Best use | For developers reviewing features as small changes and revisiting earlier steps. Start with a separate practice clone to learn working copies and Bookmarks; delay team adoption until compatibility with required Git tooling is checked. | Best for a developer or small team that wants repeatable API checks with explicit conditions stored beside the code. It links request data and identifies failing assertions without repeating manual inspection. It does not replace browser tests or test-environment setup; curl may be enough for a one-off request. | Ideal for developers, data analysts, and operators who need to clean a CSV export, inspect JSON Lines, or summarize a large file from the terminal without starting a Python project. Use it for quick, repeatable file processing; concurrent transactions and advanced visual analysis still call for a database or complementary analytics tool. |