Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Lazygit | act | dsh-chrome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | GitHub | DeepSeek Harness |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 83385 | 72437 | 9 |
| Last activity | October 15, 2026 | — | — |
| Install complexity | سهل للتثبيت؛ يحتاج معرفة Git / Easy to install; Git knowledge required | — | متوسط / Moderate |
| Category | Code Review, Git | Testing, Git, DevOps | Browser Automation, Security |
| Best use | Best for a solo developer or small team that works from the terminal and wants focused, reviewable commits. It helps select changes and open another branch in a separate working folder. It does not replace tests or Git knowledge; your editor interface may already be enough. | Best for a developer or small team that repeatedly edits GitHub Actions workflows and wants to test a job before pushing. It provides a local run log, while a final GitHub check remains necessary. It is not suitable when exact hosted-runner parity is required. | Best for a developer debugging a local or test web UI who wants a DSH agent to see the page and network evidence in the same session. It reduces manual copying and supports interactive inspection after an explicit request. Avoid it for sensitive production accounts or if broad browser permissions are unacceptable. |