Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Lazygit | ntfy | Hurl |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 / GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Stars | 83385 | 35017 | 19271 |
| Last activity | October 15, 2026 | September 29, 2026 | October 17, 2026 |
| Install complexity | سهل للتثبيت؛ يحتاج معرفة Git / Easy to install; Git knowledge required | سهل للتجربة، متوسط للاستضافة الآمنة / Easy to try, moderate to self-host securely | Easy; API and CLI knowledge required |
| Category | Code Review, Git | Workflow, DevOps | Testing, DevOps |
| Best use | Best for a solo developer or small team that works from the terminal and wants focused, reviewable commits. It helps select changes and open another branch in a separate working folder. It does not replace tests or Git knowledge; your editor interface may already be enough. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants backup, deployment, and scheduled-job alerts without building a notification app. It starts with one HTTP request and can be self-hosted with users and ACLs. It is not a complete incident-management or log-retention system. | Best for a developer or small team that wants repeatable API checks with explicit conditions stored beside the code. It links request data and identifies failing assertions without repeating manual inspection. It does not replace browser tests or test-environment setup; curl may be enough for a one-off request. |