Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Lychee | Gatus | MarkItDown |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal | Universal |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Stars | 4057 | 12429 | 192643 |
| Last activity | October 26, 2026 | September 24, 2026 | — |
| Install complexity | — | سهل إلى متوسط / Easy to moderate | سهل / Easy |
| Category | Testing, Workflow | Security, DevOps | Workflow, Research |
| Best use | For documentation authors and small teams checking references locally or in CI. Start with a specific file and interpret findings; it does not establish complete site or login functionality. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants self-hosted website, API, DNS, and certificate checks with a status page and threshold-based alerts. It combines active checks and simple history in one service. It does not replace resource monitoring, logs, or distributed tracing. | Best for a developer or analyst extracting text from several document formats before search or supplying selected passages to an AI agent. It provides a repeatable CLI command and Python library, while requiring review against the original. It is not intended for layout-perfect document publishing. |