Compare
Up to three tools. The table shows the data as-is, without picking a “best”.
| Field | Lychee | Gitleaks | Backlog.md |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Universal | Universal, GitHub | Universal, Codex, Claude Code, Cursor |
| Local support | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Paid API | No | No | No |
| License | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT | MIT |
| Stars | 4057 | 30430 | 7185 |
| Last activity | October 26, 2026 | October 23, 2026 | — |
| Install complexity | — | LOW | Easy — npm, Bun, Homebrew, or Nix |
| Category | Testing, Workflow | Security, Git, DevOps | Multi-Agent, Git, Workflow |
| Best use | For documentation authors and small teams checking references locally or in CI. Start with a specific file and interpret findings; it does not establish complete site or login functionality. | Best for an individual developer or small team that wants a local pre-commit secret scan plus a second CI gate. It is especially useful around deployment configuration and environment files. It does not replace a secret manager or credential revocation after a leak. | Best for an individual developer or small team using coding agents and wanting to review the specification and plan before code. It keeps tasks, acceptance criteria, and decisions inside the project and exposes them through CLI, a local browser, or MCP. It is not a replacement for a centralized enterprise SaaS board with organization-wide permissions and reporting. |